Health Informatics Forum

Discussion Forum for Health Informatics Professionals and Students

Mathias Lin
  • Male
  • Guangzhou
  • China, mainland
Share
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook

Mathias Lin's Friends

Mathias Lin's Groups

 

Mathias Lin | Healthcare Informatics in China

Gifts Received

Gift

Mathias Lin has not received any gifts yet

Give Mathias Lin a Gift

Latest Activity

Mathias Lin updated their profile
January 12
Mathias Lin and Yiming Qiao are now friends
June 16, 2009
Mathias Lin and mahdieh toussi are now friends
February 4, 2009

Profile Information

What is your Health Informatics Role?
Systems Analyst, Director at Meta Healthcare Systems Ltd.
About Me:
Researcher, IT consultant, software architect & engineer, entrepreneur and open source enthusiast.

My interest lies in healthcare IT and how open source and open knowledge concepts and projects can contribute to the healthcare systems in developing and emerging countries.
Website:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mathiaslin

Comment Wall (9 comments)

You need to be a member of Health Informatics Forum to add comments!

Join Health Informatics Forum

At 9:18pm on December 24, 2009, CLINT GEO MATHEW said…
At 6:48am on December 21, 2008, Abbas Shojaee said…
Thank you for your contribution. Yes I know it well but please let me know what is your point? Do you think that OpenEHR and its community can take the role of a dedicated provider for any specific Healthcare organization? Or eventually Healthcare IT department has to train a specially assigned team for that. I led a project with simillar architecture with the OpenEHR some years before OpenEHR gets available. That project which is called Hakim is now very successfuly available in the market. It helps final consumers to be very independent of providers, but again I didn't find any consumer not to need provider support for enhancement issues.
At 5:02am on December 21, 2008, Abbas Shojaee said…
Dear Mathias

I'd like to invite you to "Open source crusade, Cons and Pros?" discussion.
Here is the address:

http://www.healthinformaticsforum.com/forum/topics/open-source-crusade-cons-and?page=1&commentId=2068976%3AComment%3A15077&x=1#2068976Comment15077

Regards
Abbas
At 9:12pm on December 19, 2008, US Panigrahy said…
Hello Mathias,
It’s an opportunity to share the knowledge base for a mutual benefit in the field of Electronics Medical Recording & Practice management system.
Lets create a space for understanding each other in terms of professional needs.
Thanking you.
US Panigrahy
VP Sales & Marketing
Sindhu Synergy Ltd.
us.panigrahy@sindhusynergy.com
Skype Id:- us_panigrahy
At 5:46am on October 14, 2008, Dr. Gil (Gunter) Pollanz said…
Hi Mathias,
first: Yes, all DB like ICD-10, Phramcological DB incl. Risk Analysis and in future other knowledge management DB are installed on the card. Since each DB has about 100 to 200 MB and the cards capacity is today starting at 2GB up to 16, but in 6 month we will use only 4GB up to 32GB, capacity is not the problem.
Second, presently we offer an card-own Linux. We still work and experiment on other solution, but at the moment that seems to be the best. The card-Linux operates inside an Win-bubble, therefore does not demand restart of an MD PC.
Thirs, the card-internal system is a XML application with a strong, presentenly 99.99% save environment. In a few month we will work with a USB card that will have a microprcessor, similar like a Smart card. Than security will be 100% (unless you count the super computers of the NSA). and fourth and last: It is exactly various non-compatibale OS in hospitals that demand that the data management is on the card and not on the host system. we can take i.e. any data format in, change it into an XML object (unless teh sender has done so already) and than continue with all further methods with the same XML datastream. Eventually, at least for each patient on the card, you have created a unified standards. What will be from there? we don't know, your guess is as good as mine. But one success we had already: The German Smart Health card is already faltering because a 'stupid' smart card holds only keys and not data or applications. So, if your refer, like the governments guys did, that the data is with the hospitals and doctors, they were suprised when in tests they found out what you have asked me all about: How does a system cope with thousands of non-compatible software programs. We hope and think we have the very simple but very effective answer.
Yours
Gil
At 9:41pm on September 26, 2008, Joep Djojodibroto said…
Hi Matthias. I've visited your website and found out that you have a lot of experience in this field.
I'm a medical doctor and just knew about this field about 4 months ago. I still have some difficulties in my effort to learn and understand health informatics, my interest is in EMR/EHR.
Could you give me some advice how to learn about EMR in a simple way, where do I have to start and maybe you could suggest me some books about EMR.
Thank you.
At 8:13am on September 15, 2008, Josephine McMurray said…
Hi Matthias. Thanks for your question about open source applications. You raise an interesting point. Decisions on investing resources into "free" open source applications might be a little easier when compared to those with a price tag. However, it is clear from the literature that IT decisions are not made solely on financial considerations alone. Open Source applications might be perceived to carry higher technical and security risks. There is not a lot, in fact very little, literature on IT decision-making processes (particularly ex-ante DMP) in healthcare so my comments are purely speculative.

Interestingly, there is a move afoot in Ontario to inventory all the IT in acute care hospitals. It would be fascinating to know how much of that is Open Source. It suspect (again speculation) very little, but what a fascinating question to ask.
At 12:04am on September 9, 2008, Dr. Gil (Gunter) Pollanz said…
mathias,
your simple questoin about how doctors react opens a compendium. Let us scale it down to three subjects that each has its own life:
1) There is a shift to so-called 'social computing'. Patients are citizen and citzen are user, so it concerns all. User therefore are not satisfied any more with data-storage (the latest offer of Google) or with 'permission to see' their data that is legally theirs anyhow. They wish more, individualized service that tells ME from readiny MY data what can be done to improve health, and further on lifestyle, preventive behavior, etc.
2) The IT-Industry has reached its ultimate capacity. They cannot offer any new approach unless new technologies will allow new ways of data management. Eventually, we will have a chip implanted upon birth that will give permanent information about the relation between my age, sex, blood-pressure, Puls, weight, BMI, and so on. Why did IT fail in medical iformatics? Because they are reveue focused and not service focused. go to a VC or Bank. If you tell them that the payee is the patient they turn you down; if you tell them that the payee is a bankrupt hospital they finance you. Why? Because Health Care, as inefficient as it may be (an is) was always a 'holy cow' and was bailed out.
3) so it comes down not to the question what doctors say, since they are the least to have any decision making power of or for anything. They react to the type of service you offer them. All are exited about the new USB Med-O-Card solution: All patient data are there and they do not have to search for it! all data are coded, so the card's own data analysis givers them clinical and pharmacological answers, instantly and without having asked for it. And finally: The doctors become independent from their 'guiding force' that is an hospital administration, a health fund or a governmental plan. Its only patient and doctor. it is what the US heads of HMOs stated and have asked for: Back to the basics (roots) - we wantthat the patient has all his data and we do not wish to wait another 35 years for the health care industry to provide meaningful EHR. The industry and the organizatioins have to comply to state regulations, HIM, HIPPA, etc. etc. But not the patient - he is free, and through him his doctor. Freedom does not mean less security, etc. It just means a new decision making pair where the patient takes the lead.
Gunter
At 9:37pm on September 8, 2008, Oliver Hui said…
Hi Mathias, thanks for writing to me. When you are in HK or I am in GZ we can meet up. I think it's better we discuss verbally rather than for me to talk about Cerner via emal. I am sure that you already know about Cerner thru the cerner.com webpage anyway so it's better we have a real dialogue rather than a monologue with me doing the narrative. Look forward to seeing you soon.
 
 
 

Advertise

Follow Us on Twitter

Events

Badge

Loading…

© 2010   Created by Chris Paton.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service